Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Ehren Watada

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Are you following the Ehren Watada case - the officer who refused to go to Iraq on the grounds that it is an illegal war?

The 28-year-old soldier from Hawaii is the first commissioned officer to refuse deployment to Iraq. He is charged with "missing movement" and "conduct unbecoming an officer" including the "use of contemptuous words for the President."
...
A year ago, when Watada was on leave and out of uniform, he delivered a moving address to a Veterans for Peace convention. Watada is not a conscientious objector. He even offered to serve in Afghanistan.

But he questioned the legality of the war in Iraq, and he denounced the known lies of the George W. Bush administration. He said nothing more than what the world already knows, and he did not encourage any other soldiers to follow his example.

All the major issues of the Iraq fiasco -- the fraudulent basis for the war, the absence of a formal declaration from Congress (which has no constitutional authority to transfer its war-declaring power to another branch), the war crimes, the flagrant violations of international treaties such as the United Nations Charter -- are coming to a head in this historic battle between a junior officer and an army whose Abu Ghraib torture scandals shocked the world.

Ordinarily, the truth of a claim is a strong defense against any charge of defamation. Not in the Army, however. Army prosecutors do not intend to allow Watada any opportunity to prove in court that everything he said about the president is true. Prosecutors told the presiding judge, Lt. Col. John Head, that the truthfulness of Watada's speech is irrelevant to the case.

If Watada's defense is not allowed in court, he really has no chance.

I wonder if these facts will be allowed:

There are only two conditions in which a war is legal under international law: when force is authorized by the United Nations Security Council or when the use of force is an act of national self-defense and survival. The UN Charter, based on the Nuremberg Principles, prohibits war "as an instrument of policy." And the war in Iraq is just that -- a war of choice.

There is a common tendency among lawyers and military commanders to sneer at international law. But the Constitution is unambiguous: Article VI states, "All Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby."

Watada's court martial began February 5. I'm eagerly awaiting the outcome. I hate to make such a pessimistic prediction, but I really think he's going to prison.

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous7:08 PM

    I hope this guy burns in prison. HE signed, HE goes. No if's, and's or buts. That's it. This is not a draft war. He signed up of his own accord. He must assume responsibility for his trator actions. What would happen if our armed forces where able to decide if and where they will be deployed? I'd hate to think about it. We would be way worse off than we are now. He is an embarassment to his country and the true American warriors who are doing their jobs. When the rest of his troop get back from Iraq I hope they beat the living shit out of him.

    A True AMERICAN

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, "True American", I know you represent a lot of people in this country. However, when military personnel are sworn in, they swear to uphold the CONSTITUTION. They also are actually trained NOT to obey illegal orders. Did you even read the article?

    I admire him. I think he's showing a lot of courage and is obeying his conscience.

    ReplyDelete

New policy: Anonymous posts must be signed or they will be deleted. Pick a name, any name (it could be Paperclip or Doorknob), but identify yourself in some way. Thank you.